TSTP Solution File: SEV134^5 by Vampire-SAT---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem  : SEV134^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May  5 09:43:56 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 0.39s
% Output   : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   24 (   3 unt;  13 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  133 (  32 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (  12 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   56 (  19   ~;  10   |;  14   &;   0   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  13  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   8 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   42 (  41   >;   1   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   15 (  12 usr;   3 con; 0-6 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   45 (   0   ^  30   !;   9   ?;  45   :)
%                                         (   6  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   0  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(type_def_6,type,
    sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    sK0: a > a > $o ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    sK1: a ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    sK2: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    kCOMB: 
      !>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( X0 > X1 > X0 ) ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    bCOMB: 
      !>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType,X2: $tType] : ( ( X1 > X2 ) > ( X0 > X1 ) > X0 > X2 ) ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    vAND: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_11,type,
    vOR: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_12,type,
    vIMP: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_13,type,
    vNOT: $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_14,type,
    vEQ: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( X0 > X0 > $o ) ).

thf(f42,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f13,f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    $true = vAPP(a,$o,sK2,sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ( $true != vAPP(a,$o,sK2,sK1) )
    & ( $true = vAPP(a,$o,sK2,sK1) )
    & ! [X3: a,X4: a] :
        ( ( $true = vAPP(a,$o,sK2,X4) )
        | ( $true != vAPP(a,$o,sK2,X3) )
        | ( $true != vAPP(a,$o,vAPP(a,sTfun(a,$o),sK0,X3),X4) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f8,f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ? [X0: a > a > $o,X1: a,X2: a > $o] :
        ( ( vAPP(a,$o,X2,X1) != $true )
        & ( vAPP(a,$o,X2,X1) = $true )
        & ! [X3: a,X4: a] :
            ( ( vAPP(a,$o,X2,X4) = $true )
            | ( vAPP(a,$o,X2,X3) != $true )
            | ( vAPP(a,$o,vAPP(a,sTfun(a,$o),X0,X3),X4) != $true ) ) )
   => ( ( $true != vAPP(a,$o,sK2,sK1) )
      & ( $true = vAPP(a,$o,sK2,sK1) )
      & ! [X4: a,X3: a] :
          ( ( $true = vAPP(a,$o,sK2,X4) )
          | ( $true != vAPP(a,$o,sK2,X3) )
          | ( $true != vAPP(a,$o,vAPP(a,sTfun(a,$o),sK0,X3),X4) ) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ? [X0: a > a > $o,X1: a,X2: a > $o] :
      ( ( vAPP(a,$o,X2,X1) != $true )
      & ( vAPP(a,$o,X2,X1) = $true )
      & ! [X3: a,X4: a] :
          ( ( vAPP(a,$o,X2,X4) = $true )
          | ( vAPP(a,$o,X2,X3) != $true )
          | ( vAPP(a,$o,vAPP(a,sTfun(a,$o),X0,X3),X4) != $true ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ? [X0: a > a > $o,X1: a,X2: a > $o] :
      ( ( vAPP(a,$o,X2,X1) != $true )
      & ( vAPP(a,$o,X2,X1) = $true )
      & ! [X3: a,X4: a] :
          ( ( vAPP(a,$o,X2,X4) = $true )
          | ( vAPP(a,$o,X2,X3) != $true )
          | ( vAPP(a,$o,vAPP(a,sTfun(a,$o),X0,X3),X4) != $true ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a > a > $o,X1: a,X2: a > $o] :
        ( ! [X3: a,X4: a] :
            ( ( ( vAPP(a,$o,X2,X3) = $true )
              & ( vAPP(a,$o,vAPP(a,sTfun(a,$o),X0,X3),X4) = $true ) )
           => ( vAPP(a,$o,X2,X4) = $true ) )
       => ( ( vAPP(a,$o,X2,X1) = $true )
         => ( vAPP(a,$o,X2,X1) = $true ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a > a > $o,X1: a,X2: a > $o] :
        ( ! [X3: a,X4: a] :
            ( ( vAPP(a,$o,X2,X3)
              & vAPP(a,$o,vAPP(a,sTfun(a,$o),X0,X3),X4) )
           => vAPP(a,$o,X2,X4) )
       => ( vAPP(a,$o,X2,X1)
         => vAPP(a,$o,X2,X1) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0: a > a > $o,X1: a,X2: a > $o] :
        ( ! [X3: a,X4: a] :
            ( ( vAPP(a,$o,X2,X3)
              & vAPP(a,$o,vAPP(a,sTfun(a,$o),X0,X3),X4) )
           => vAPP(a,$o,X2,X4) )
       => ( vAPP(a,$o,X2,X1)
         => vAPP(a,$o,X2,X1) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X0: a > a > $o,X1: a,X2: a > $o] :
      ( ! [X3: a,X4: a] :
          ( ( vAPP(a,$o,X2,X3)
            & vAPP(a,$o,vAPP(a,sTfun(a,$o),X0,X3),X4) )
         => vAPP(a,$o,X2,X4) )
     => ( vAPP(a,$o,X2,X1)
       => vAPP(a,$o,X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTHM201_pme) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    $true != vAPP(a,$o,sK2,sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem    : SEV134^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.04/0.14  % Command    : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 11:51:33 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.36  % (5019)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.22/0.38  % (5020)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.22/0.38  % Exception at run slice level
% 0.22/0.38  User error: Finite model buillding is currently not compatible with polymorphism or higher-order constructs
% 0.22/0.39  % (5025)dis+11_4:5_nm=4_216 on theBenchmark for (216ds/0Mi)
% 0.22/0.39  % (5026)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2:si=on:rtra=on:rawr=on:rp=on:fmbksg=on_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.22/0.39  % Exception at run slice level
% 0.22/0.39  User error: Finite model buillding is currently not compatible with polymorphism or higher-order constructs
% 0.22/0.39  % (5025)First to succeed.
% 0.22/0.39  % (5025)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-5019"
% 0.22/0.39  % (5021)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.22/0.39  % (5023)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3:gsp=on:nm=4_470 on theBenchmark for (470ds/0Mi)
% 0.22/0.39  % (5024)dis+1_20_av=off:lcm=predicate:nm=2:nwc=2.0_396 on theBenchmark for (396ds/0Mi)
% 0.22/0.39  % (5022)dis-2_2:3_amm=sco:anc=none:bce=on:fsr=off:gsp=on:nm=16:nwc=1.2:nicw=on:sac=on:sp=weighted_frequency_476 on theBenchmark for (476ds/0Mi)
% 0.22/0.39  % (5025)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.22/0.39  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.39  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.39  % (5025)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39  % (5025)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.22/0.39  % (5025)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.22/0.39  
% 0.22/0.39  % (5025)Memory used [KB]: 752
% 0.22/0.39  % (5025)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.39  % (5025)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.22/0.39  % (5019)Success in time 0.027 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------